¦C¦L¼Ò¦¡¥DÃD
«ö³o¸ÌÀ˵ø¥»¥DÃDªº­ì©l®æ¦¡
­»´ä¤T°ê½×¾Â > Ãf¦¿«° > ¬¡ÅD«×³]©w


µoªíªÌ: ¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 Aug 19 2015, 13:48
¥¼¨Ó¤T¤é¤½¥qÁ|¿ì®i¾P·|¡A§Ú­n¸ò¦ÑÁóÀH¦æ¡A§Æ±æ¬¡ÅD«×¤U­°¤£·|>2...( T - T ) (¥D¤½~ §Ú«Ü¦b¥G¦Û¤vªº¬¡ÅD«×~ §ÚÄ@·N¥ÎÁn±æ´«¨ú¬¡ÅD«× mad.gif ¥D¤½±z¦Ò¼{¤@¤U )

µoªíªÌ: Caesar Aug 19 2015, 17:01
QUOTE (¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 @ Aug 19 2015, 21:48 )
¥¼¨Ó¤T¤é¤½¥qÁ|¿ì®i¾P·|¡A§Ú­n¸ò¦ÑÁóÀH¦æ¡A§Æ±æ¬¡ÅD«×¤U­°¤£·|>2...( T - T ) (¥D¤½~ §Ú«Ü¦b¥G¦Û¤vªº¬¡ÅD«×~ §ÚÄ@·N¥ÎÁn±æ´«¨ú¬¡ÅD«× mad.gif ¥D¤½±z¦Ò¼{¤@¤U )

§A¥ý³]©w¤@¤U¶×²v¡A¤~¨Ó¤Wproposal

µoªíªÌ: ¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 Aug 19 2015, 17:24
QUOTE (Caesar @ Aug 19 2015, 17:01 )
QUOTE (¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 @ Aug 19 2015, 21:48 )
¥¼¨Ó¤T¤é¤½¥qÁ|¿ì®i¾P·|¡A§Ú­n¸ò¦ÑÁóÀH¦æ¡A§Æ±æ¬¡ÅD«×¤U­°¤£·|>2...( T - T ) (¥D¤½~ §Ú«Ü¦b¥G¦Û¤vªº¬¡ÅD«×~ §ÚÄ@·N¥ÎÁn±æ´«¨ú¬¡ÅD«× mad.gif ¥D¤½±z¦Ò¼{¤@¤U )

§A¥ý³]©w¤@¤U¶×²v¡A¤~¨Ó¤Wproposal

©êºp¡A ¶×²v¤è­±¥¼¦³©P¸Ôªº¦Ò¼{... §Úµo²{¤@¨Ç·|­ûªº¬¡ÅD«×¤Q¤À¤£³ô¡A¾¨ºÞ¥L­Ìªñ´Á¤Q¤À¬¡ÅD... ¥i¨£´¿¸g¼ç¤ô¤@¬q®É¶¡ªº·|­û, »Ý­n«Üº©ªøªº®É¶¡¤~¯à±N¬¡ÅD«×¥[¦^¥h¡C¨Ò¦p·|­ûPearltea¡A¥L/¦oºâ¬Oªñ´Á³Ì¬¡ÅDªº·|­û¤§¤@¡A«ùÄòµn¤J¦Ó¥B¿n·¥°Ñ»P°Q½×¡C¦ý§Ú¬Ý¥L/¦oªº¬¡ÅD«×¤@ª½¨S«ç»ò¦^¤É¹L¡A¤´µM¬O­Ó«Ü¤£³ôªº¼Æ¦r( = =") ¡A¾¨ºÞ¥L/¦o¥i¯à®Ú¥»¤£¦b¥G...§Ú¬O¦bÁ|¨Ò¡C§Ú¤@ª½¦³­Ó¦L¶H¡A´N¬O¬¡ÅD«×­°¤F¡A¤£©ö¥[¦^¥h( = =") ¶×²v¤è­±¹À...³Ì²³æ¥i¥H¬O1Án±æ=1¬¡ÅD«×¡AOR 1%ªºÁn±æ=1¬¡ÅD«×(¹ïÁn±æ°ªªº·|­û¡A¨Ò¦p¥D¤½¡A¤Ó¬½( = =") etc. ©ú¦­°_·|³sÄò¦£¦n´X¤Ñ¡Aµy«á¦A¤W¨Ó»¡»¡(¤Ï¥¿Án±æ¦n¹³¨SÔ£¥Î¡A¤S¤£¯à¦Y...)

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 19 2015, 17:40
QUOTE
¤´µM¬O­Ó«Ü¤£³ôªº¼Æ¦r( = =")

LOL. Thanks for calling me out for being inactive.

If I have to guess how the active level is calculated, it should be by the following formula:

# of days logged into HKSAN / (Today - Date Registered).

So based on my registration date you know that out of those 4,000+ days, there were many, many days I didn't log in.

Let me try to solve your problem. Your active level is 90% and your registration was on Oct 8, 2014, so it's been 315 days since your account is activated. 90% reflects approximately 284 days of recorded login. Therefore, if you have no login records in the next 3 days, your active level will drop to 89.3% (284/(315+3)). However, in the next following 7 days, if you login again every single day, you'll be back to 90% (round up (291/325 or 89.5%)

µoªíªÌ: ¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 Aug 19 2015, 21:42
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 19 2015, 17:40 )
QUOTE
¤´µM¬O­Ó«Ü¤£³ôªº¼Æ¦r( = =")

LOL. Thanks for calling me out for being inactive.

If I have to guess how the active level is calculated, it should be by the following formula:

# of days logged into HKSAN / (Today - Date Registered).

So based on my registration date you know that out of those 4,000+ days, there were many, many days I didn't log in.

Let me try to solve your problem. Your active level is 90% and your registration was on Oct 8, 2014, so it's been 315 days since your account is activated. 90% reflects approximately 284 days of recorded login. Therefore, if you have no login records in the next 3 days, your active level will drop to 89.3% (284/(315+3)). However, in the next following 7 days, if you login again every single day, you'll be back to 90% (round up (291/325 or 89.5%)

ÁÂÁ¡C±ß¤W6ÂI¥ª¥k¨£¨ì§A¡A¦­¤W5ÂI¥b¤S¨£¨ì§A¡A§A¦³¨¬°÷ªººÎ¯v¶Ü¡H¬O­Ó¹q¸£¤£Â÷¨­ªº¤H¡H¦pªG§Ú¨Sºâ¿ùªº¸Ü¡A´Nºâ¥¼¨Ó10¦~§A­·«B¤£§ï¦a¨C¤Ñµn¤J¡A§Aªº¬¡ÅD«×¥u·|¦^¤É¨ì55-56 ( = =") ÀHµÛµn¤Jªº¤Ñ¼Æ¼W¥[¡AÁ`µù¥U¤Ñ¼Æ¤]¦b¼W¥[... ¨º­Ó¬¡ÅD«×¦pªG­n°lªº¸Ü¡A­n¥Î¥b¥Íªº®É¶¡...

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 19 2015, 22:58
§Ú¤£¦b­»´ä ohmy.gif

§Ú¨S¦³³o»òªø®É¶¡¦bhksan, ¨ä¹ê¤j¦h¬O¥Î¹q¸Üªºbrowser app¤W¨Ó¬Ý§¹¶K, ¦ý¤£°O±oclose app.

µoªíªÌ: neveryield Aug 20 2015, 04:01
QUOTE (¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 @ Aug 20 2015, 05:42 )
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 19 2015, 17:40 )
QUOTE
¤´µM¬O­Ó«Ü¤£³ôªº¼Æ¦r( = =")

LOL. Thanks for calling me out for being inactive.

If I have to guess how the active level is calculated, it should be by the following formula:

# of days logged into HKSAN / (Today - Date Registered).

So based on my registration date you know that out of those 4,000+ days, there were many, many days I didn't log in.

Let me try to solve your problem. Your active level is 90% and your registration was on Oct 8, 2014, so it's been 315 days since your account is activated. 90% reflects approximately 284 days of recorded login. Therefore, if you have no login records in the next 3 days, your active level will drop to 89.3% (284/(315+3)). However, in the next following 7 days, if you login again every single day, you'll be back to 90% (round up (291/325 or 89.5%)

ÁÂÁ¡C±ß¤W6ÂI¥ª¥k¨£¨ì§A¡A¦­¤W5ÂI¥b¤S¨£¨ì§A¡A§A¦³¨¬°÷ªººÎ¯v¶Ü¡H¬O­Ó¹q¸£¤£Â÷¨­ªº¤H¡H¦pªG§Ú¨Sºâ¿ùªº¸Ü¡A´Nºâ¥¼¨Ó10¦~§A­·«B¤£§ï¦a¨C¤Ñµn¤J¡A§Aªº¬¡ÅD«×¥u·|¦^¤É¨ì55-56 ( = =") ÀHµÛµn¤Jªº¤Ñ¼Æ¼W¥[¡AÁ`µù¥U¤Ñ¼Æ¤]¦b¼W¥[... ¨º­Ó¬¡ÅD«×¦pªG­n°lªº¸Ü¡A­n¥Î¥b¥Íªº®É¶¡...

©Ò¥H§A»¡»¡¬Ý Ãi³D¤j¤j¨s³º¬O¦³¦hÃi¡C

µoªíªÌ: ¦Ô¤à¤ó Aug 20 2015, 05:19
¨ä¹ê¬¡ÅD«×À³¸Ó¬O¥Î³Ìªñªºµo©«¼Æ°µ­pºâ§a¡A«ç·|¥Î©Ò¦³®É¶¡¨Ó­pºâ¡A¦Ó¥B¤ñ­«ÁÙ­n¤@¼Ë¡H

§Ú«Øij¬¡ÅD«× = ³o¬P´Áµo©«¶q ¡Ï ¤W¬P´Áµo©«¶q x 0.9 + 2¬P´Á«eµo©«¶q x 0.9^2 + ...
(§Y¬O n¬P´Á«eµo©«¶q x 0.9^(n)ªºÁ`©M¡An = 0 - µL­­¤j¡]·íµM¹ê»Ú­pºâ¤£»Ý­nµL­­¤j§a¡^

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 20 2015, 07:19
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 19 2015, 22:19 )
¨ä¹ê¬¡ÅD«×À³¸Ó¬O¥Î³Ìªñªºµo©«¼Æ°µ­pºâ§a¡A«ç·|¥Î©Ò¦³®É¶¡¨Ó­pºâ¡A¦Ó¥B¤ñ­«ÁÙ­n¤@¼Ë¡H

§Ú«Øij¬¡ÅD«× = ³o¬P´Áµo©«¶q ¡Ï ¤W¬P´Áµo©«¶q x 0.9 + 2¬P´Á«eµo©«¶q x 0.9^2 + ...
(§Y¬O n¬P´Á«eµo©«¶q x 0.9^(n)ªºÁ`©M¡An = 0 - µL­­¤j¡]·íµM¹ê»Ú­pºâ¤£»Ý­nµL­­¤j§a¡^

¤@­¶´X¤Q­Ópost¡A¨C¤H¤À§O²Î­p¥»¬P´Áµo©«¶q~N¬P´Á«eµo©«¶q¡Adb queries­t²ü¤Ó­«¤F§a¡H

¦Ó¥B¬¡ÅD«×­ì¥»¥s¡u©¾¸Û«×¡v¡A¦³¤@­Ó¥Î·N¬O²Î­p¥Î¤á¬O§_¸g±`³X°Ý½×¾Â¡A°Ï¤À¦­¤wÂ÷¶}ªº©M¸g±`¦^¨Ó¦ý¥¼¥²¸g±`µo¨¥ªº¡C

·íµM²{¦b¥Î¨Ó³X¦¸¼Æ°£Á`µù¥U®É¶¡¬O¤£²z·Q¡C

¦³§ó¦nªº·QªkÅwªï´£¥X¡C

µoªíªÌ: neveryield Aug 20 2015, 07:51
¨ä¹ê¤T­Ó¤ë¤£¤W½uÀ³¸Ó¥i¥HÂkÃþ¤£¬¡ÅD¤F§a¡A©Ò¥H¤T­Ó¤ë²`¼çªº¥i¥Hµ¹0¤À¡C

µM«á®Ú¾Ú¦s¦b©Ê½è§@¥X¦³¤À§Oªº­p¤À:
1. ¤W½u ¥¼µo¨¥
2. µoªí¦^ÂСA¶i¦æµû»ù¡A²á¤Ñ«Ç
3. ¶}·s¥DÃD

¦b¦h­Ó¤£¦Pªº¤å³¹µo¨¥¥i±o¥[¦¨
¦b¦h­Ó«°¦À¹F¤@©w¬¡ÅDµ{«×¥i¥[¦¨

¥Ñ©ó»D¸Ü¥iÀH«K»¡¡AÄYµÂ¸ÜÃD«h¤£©ö¡A©Ò¥H¬F¸g¥v¦a¤å±Ð¬ì¾Ç¤§Ãþµû¤À¸û°ª¡A¶¼°Ú­¹°Úª±ªºµû¤À¸û§C¡C

¬¡ÅD­È¬JµM¤À¤@¦Ê¯Å¡A·Q­n°ª¯Å´N·íµM­n·¥¦h¬¡°Ê¤~¥i¥H§â³D±q100©Ô¤U¨Ó

·íµMÁÙ¥i¥H©Ô¦±½u

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 20 2015, 10:18
¦pªG¦³¤H¦n©_²{¦bªº¬¡ÅD«×¬O«çºâªº¡A¨ä¹ê¤]¤£¬O¤°»ò¯µ±K¡G

CODE
 $activ=50;
  if($row['activity'] >= $numofdays) $row['activity'] = $numofdays;
  if($numofdays>=2) $activ = floor(60*($row['activity']/$numofdays));
  if($numofdays>=6) $activ = floor(80*($row['activity']/$numofdays));
  if($numofdays>=10) $activ = floor(100*($row['activity']/$numofdays));
  if($activ >=100) $activ = 100;
  if($row['activity'] <= 0) $activ = 0;

¸ÑÄÀ¡G$numofdays¬O¦¨爲µù¥U·|­ûªº¤é¼Æ¡A$row['activity']¤j·§µ¥©ó¦³µn¤Jªº¤é¼Æ¡A$activ¬O³Ì²×¬¡ÅD«×¡C爲¦óºâªk¼g¦¨³o¼Ë¤£­n°Ý§Ú¡A³o»ò¦h¦~«eªº¨Æ§Ú¤£°O±o¤F¡C tongue.gif

­n§ïªº¸Ü¡A³Ìªñn¤Ñ¤ºªºµo¨¥¼Æ¡B¶}¥DÃD¼Æ©Îµû¤À¦¸¼Æ¡A²z½×¤W¤]¥i¥[¤J¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ¡A¤£¹L­n¦b¨C©«²Î­p³o¨Ç·N¨ý着¨CÅã¥Ü¤@­Ópost³£­n¦³¬Û·í¦hªºdatabase io¡A¥i¯à­t¸ü²¤¤j¡A²Î­p¤èªk¤Ó½ÆÂø®£©È·|ÅܺC¡C³Ì«á¨ì³X¤é´Á¡B³Ì«á¬¡°Ê¤é´Á³o¨Çª½±µ¦³°O¿ý¡A¥[¤J¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ­Ë¬O®e©ö¡C¦U¦ì¥i¦³·Qªk¡H

µoªíªÌ: ¦Ô¤à¤ó Aug 20 2015, 10:50
¦pªG­pN¦¸¡A§Úªº½T§Ñ¤F¦Ò¼{database ioªº°ÝÃD damn.gif

¦pªG¨Ò¦p¥u¬O­p¤T¦¸¡A¨Ò¦p¤W¤@­Ó¤ëªºµn¤J¼Æx1 + ¦A¤W¤@­Ó¤ëªº/2 + ¤W¨â­Ó¤ë´N/4·|§_²³æ¤@¨Ç¡H (¤T±øsubquery·|§_¤Ó¦h¤F)

¦pªGÁÙ¬O¤Ó¦hªº¸Ü¡Aµw©Ê³W©w¤@­Ó¤Ñ¼Æªºthreshold¤]¤£¬O¤£¦æ

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 20 2015, 11:50
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 20 2015, 03:50 )
¦pªG­pN¦¸¡A§Úªº½T§Ñ¤F¦Ò¼{database ioªº°ÝÃD damn.gif

¦pªG¨Ò¦p¥u¬O­p¤T¦¸¡A¨Ò¦p¤W¤@­Ó¤ëªºµn¤J¼Æx1 + ¦A¤W¤@­Ó¤ëªº/2 + ¤W¨â­Ó¤ë´N/4·|§_²³æ¤@¨Ç¡H (¤T±øsubquery·|§_¤Ó¦h¤F)

¦pªGÁÙ¬O¤Ó¦hªº¸Ü¡Aµw©Ê³W©w¤@­Ó¤Ñ¼Æªºthreshold¤]¤£¬O¤£¦æ

¯d¨¥©Îµû»ù©|¥i统计®É¶¡¡Aµn¤J/³X°Ý¬O¥u¦³Á`¦¸¼Æ¡A¨S¦³¨C¦¸®É¶¡°O¿ýªº¡C

µoªíªÌ: Âû¥JáM Aug 20 2015, 12:32
¬¡ÅD«×­«­n¶Ü

µoªíªÌ: neveryield Aug 20 2015, 13:37
QUOTE (Âû¥JáM @ Aug 20 2015, 20:32 )
¬¡ÅD«×­«­n¶Ü

¦¹¬O²M½Í°Ï¡C

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 20 2015, 14:14
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 20 2015, 18:18 )
¦pªG¦³¤H¦n©_²{¦bªº¬¡ÅD«×¬O«çºâªº¡A¨ä¹ê¤]¤£¬O¤°»ò¯µ±K¡G

CODE
 $activ=50;
  if($row['activity'] >= $numofdays) $row['activity'] = $numofdays;
  if($numofdays>=2) $activ = floor(60*($row['activity']/$numofdays));
  if($numofdays>=6) $activ = floor(80*($row['activity']/$numofdays));
  if($numofdays>=10) $activ = floor(100*($row['activity']/$numofdays));
  if($activ >=100) $activ = 100;
  if($row['activity'] <= 0) $activ = 0;

¸ÑÄÀ¡G$numofdays¬O¦¨爲µù¥U·|­ûªº¤é¼Æ¡A$row['activity']¤j·§µ¥©ó¦³µn¤Jªº¤é¼Æ¡A$activ¬O³Ì²×¬¡ÅD«×¡C爲¦óºâªk¼g¦¨³o¼Ë¤£­n°Ý§Ú¡A³o»ò¦h¦~«eªº¨Æ§Ú¤£°O±o¤F¡C  tongue.gif

­n§ïªº¸Ü¡A³Ìªñn¤Ñ¤ºªºµo¨¥¼Æ¡B¶}¥DÃD¼Æ©Îµû¤À¦¸¼Æ¡A²z½×¤W¤]¥i¥[¤J¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ¡A¤£¹L­n¦b¨C©«²Î­p³o¨Ç·N¨ýþÓ¨CÅã¥Ü¤@­Ópost³£­n¦³¬Û·í¦hªºdatabase io¡A¥i¯à­t¸ü²¤¤j¡A²Î­p¤èªk¤Ó½ÆÂø®£©È·|ÅܺC¡C³Ì«á¨ì³X¤é´Á¡B³Ì«á¬¡°Ê¤é´Á³o¨Çª½±µ¦³°O¿ý¡A¥[¤J¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ­Ë¬O®e©ö¡C¦U¦ì¥i¦³·Qªk¡H

If Activity is the number of logged in, that means it can be unlimited regardless of the days registered.

I actually like ¦Ô¤à¤ó's proposal. Weighing activities from more recent time period makes the stats more time sensitive and relevant. Then if we define activity as # of post, it might actually encourage more users to participate in discussions.

T=Today()
T30 = T - 30
T60 = T - 60
T90 = T - 90

A30 = Sumif(ListofUsers, Username, Activity) Between #T30# And #T#
A60 = Sumif(ListofUsers, Username, Activity) Between #T60# And #T30#
A90 = Sumif(ListofUsers, Username, Activity) Between #T90# And #T60#


Min(1, (A30*0.7+A60*0.2+A90*0.1)/30)

µoªíªÌ: ¦Ô¤à¤ó Aug 20 2015, 14:33
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 20 2015, 19:50 )
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 20 2015, 03:50 )
¦pªG­pN¦¸¡A§Úªº½T§Ñ¤F¦Ò¼{database ioªº°ÝÃD damn.gif

¦pªG¨Ò¦p¥u¬O­p¤T¦¸¡A¨Ò¦p¤W¤@­Ó¤ëªºµn¤J¼Æx1 + ¦A¤W¤@­Ó¤ëªº/2 + ¤W¨â­Ó¤ë´N/4·|§_²³æ¤@¨Ç¡H (¤T±øsubquery·|§_¤Ó¦h¤F)

¦pªGÁÙ¬O¤Ó¦hªº¸Ü¡Aµw©Ê³W©w¤@­Ó¤Ñ¼Æªºthreshold¤]¤£¬O¤£¦æ

¯d¨¥©Îµû»ù©|¥i统计®É¶¡¡Aµn¤J/³X°Ý¬O¥u¦³Á`¦¸¼Æ¡A¨S¦³¨C¦¸®É¶¡°O¿ýªº¡C

¨º¼Ë¨ä¹ê¥Î¯d¨¥+µû»ù¤]¥i¥Hªº¡A¤£¤@©w­n¥Îµn¤J®É¶¡

---

¤S·Q¨ì¤@¥ó¨Æ¡A¦pªG¦p¹ê¦a¥u­p90¤Ñ¤ºªº©«¤lªº¸Ü¡AÀ³¸Ó¦³«Ü¦h¤Hªº¬¡ÅD«×·|Åܦ¨¹s¤F tongue.gif ¤]³\¥i¥H¥[¤@­ÓÁ`©«¼Æ/Á`¤Ñ¼Æx0.1§@¥´©³ grin2.gif

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 20 2015, 14:39
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 20 2015, 22:33 )
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 20 2015, 19:50 )
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 20 2015, 03:50 )
¦pªG­pN¦¸¡A§Úªº½T§Ñ¤F¦Ò¼{database ioªº°ÝÃD damn.gif

¦pªG¨Ò¦p¥u¬O­p¤T¦¸¡A¨Ò¦p¤W¤@­Ó¤ëªºµn¤J¼Æx1 + ¦A¤W¤@­Ó¤ëªº/2 + ¤W¨â­Ó¤ë´N/4·|§_²³æ¤@¨Ç¡H (¤T±øsubquery·|§_¤Ó¦h¤F)

¦pªGÁÙ¬O¤Ó¦hªº¸Ü¡Aµw©Ê³W©w¤@­Ó¤Ñ¼Æªºthreshold¤]¤£¬O¤£¦æ

¯d¨¥©Îµû»ù©|¥i统计®É¶¡¡Aµn¤J/³X°Ý¬O¥u¦³Á`¦¸¼Æ¡A¨S¦³¨C¦¸®É¶¡°O¿ýªº¡C

¨º¼Ë¨ä¹ê¥Î¯d¨¥+µû»ù¤]¥i¥Hªº¡A¤£¤@©w­n¥Îµn¤J®É¶¡

---

¤S·Q¨ì¤@¥ó¨Æ¡A¦pªG¦p¹ê¦a¥u­p90¤Ñ¤ºªº©«¤lªº¸Ü¡AÀ³¸Ó¦³«Ü¦h¤Hªº¬¡ÅD«×·|Åܦ¨¹s¤F tongue.gif ¤]³\¥i¥H¥[¤@­ÓÁ`©«¼Æ/Á`¤Ñ¼Æx0.1§@¥´©³ grin2.gif

Do you mean 0.1% or 10%?

Maybe Max (0.1, Min(1, (A30*0.7+A60*0.2+A90*0.1)/30))?

µoªíªÌ: ¦Ô¤à¤ó Aug 20 2015, 14:43
§Úªº·Qªk¬O

A1 + A2 x 0.75 + A3 x 0.5 + AInf x 0.1ªº (AInft¬OÁ`©«¼Æ/Á`¤Ñ¼Æ)

---

(·íµM¤¸ª½À³¸Ó»Ý­nºCºC½Õ¼Æ­Èªº¡A§Ú­Ì¨S¼Æ¾Ú½Õ¤£¤F tongue.gif )

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 20 2015, 14:57
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 20 2015, 22:43 )
§Úªº·Qªk¬O

A1 + A2 x 0.75 + A3 x 0.5 + AInf x 0.1ªº (AInft¬OÁ`©«¼Æ/Á`¤Ñ¼Æ)

---

(·íµM¤¸ª½À³¸Ó»Ý­nºCºC½Õ¼Æ­Èªº¡A§Ú­Ì¨S¼Æ¾Ú½Õ¤£¤F  tongue.gif )

Are 'A's numbers of post or logged in? Actual count or average of the past 30 days?

Don't we need a denominator for a ratio? In your formula the base is 2.25 before the bonus or minimum of 0.1 is accounted for.

If A is Activity over the past 30-days, it could be:

Min(1, (A1 + A2 x 0.75 + A3 x 0.5 )/2.25 + AInf x 0.1)

µoªíªÌ: ¦Ô¤à¤ó Aug 20 2015, 22:52
I just omitted any normalization tongue.gif

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 21 2015, 08:57
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 20 2015, 07:33 )
¨º¼Ë¨ä¹ê¥Î¯d¨¥+µû»ù¤]¥i¥Hªº¡A¤£¤@©w­n¥Îµn¤J®É¶¡

---

¤S·Q¨ì¤@¥ó¨Æ¡A¦pªG¦p¹ê¦a¥u­p90¤Ñ¤ºªº©«¤lªº¸Ü¡AÀ³¸Ó¦³«Ü¦h¤Hªº¬¡ÅD«×·|Åܦ¨¹s¤F tongue.gif ¤]³\¥i¥H¥[¤@­ÓÁ`©«¼Æ/Á`¤Ñ¼Æx0.1§@¥´©³ grin2.gif

¥¿¦b´ú¸Õ¥Î³Ìªñ¯d¨¥¼Æ¨Ó¨M©w¬¡ÅD«×¡C¶È¶È²Î­p¨C¤H³Ìªñ7¤Ñªºµo©«¼Æ¡]爲­¶­±¤¤¨C¤@­Óµo©«ªÌ¥u¶]¤@¦¸SELECT COUNTªºquery¡^¡AScript Execution time´N±q0.03¬íöt¤É¤@­Ó¼Æ¶q¯Å¨ì0.3¬í¥ª¥k¡A¼Wªø¤F¤Q­¿¡C damn.gif

µoªíªÌ: ¦Ô¤à¤ó Aug 21 2015, 11:21
blink.gif

¥i§_¨C¤Ñ¥Îcron job­pºâ¤@¦¸µM«áÀx¦b¤@Äæ¸Ì¡H

µoªíªÌ: neveryield Aug 21 2015, 15:44
¤£¬O¦³ "¤µ¤éµoªí«e¤Q" ¡A"³Ìªñ¤C¤Ñµoªí«e¤Q" ¤@Ãþ²Î­p¶Ü¡H

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 21 2015, 17:19
QUOTE (neveryield @ Aug 21 2015, 08:44 )
¤£¬O¦³ "¤µ¤éµoªí«e¤Q" ¡A"³Ìªñ¤C¤Ñµoªí«e¤Q" ¤@Ãþ²Î­p¶Ü¡H

¦³¡A¦ý¸Ó­¶¤]¬OÅã¥Ü¤~²Î­p¡A°õ¦æ®É¶¡¦b1.5¬í¥ª¥k¡C

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 21 2015, 17:30
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 21 2015, 19:21 )
blink.gif

¥i§_¨C¤Ñ¥Îcron job­pºâ¤@¦¸µM«áÀx¦b¤@Äæ¸Ì¡H

¤¸ª½, is it time consuming to run what ¦Ô¤à¤ó proposed - daily update?

I would assume that even with daily posts/votes, the activity level wouldn't change so much to the point that requires recalculations every time a post is loaded.

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 21 2015, 18:39
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 21 2015, 10:30 )
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 21 2015, 19:21 )
blink.gif

¥i§_¨C¤Ñ¥Îcron job­pºâ¤@¦¸µM«áÀx¦b¤@Äæ¸Ì¡H

¤¸ª½, is it time consuming to run what ¦Ô¤à¤ó proposed - daily update?

I would assume that with even daily posts/votes, the activity level wouldn't change so much to the point that requires recalculations every time a post is loaded.

Cron job should be feasible, I'm testing the code now.

Edit: Just tested the code, takes less than 10 seconds to count last-7-and-30-day post numbers for each of the ~4300 members. This should work. I'm going to add reputation vote counter as well.

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 21 2015, 19:48
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 02:39 )
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 21 2015, 10:30 )
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 21 2015, 19:21 )
blink.gif

¥i§_¨C¤Ñ¥Îcron job­pºâ¤@¦¸µM«áÀx¦b¤@Äæ¸Ì¡H

¤¸ª½, is it time consuming to run what ¦Ô¤à¤ó proposed - daily update?

I would assume that with even daily posts/votes, the activity level wouldn't change so much to the point that requires recalculations every time a post is loaded.

Cron job should be feasible, I'm testing the code now.

Edit: Just tested the code, takes less than 10 seconds to count last-7-and-30-day post numbers for each of the ~4300 members. This should work. I'm going to add reputation vote counter as well.

Hooray!

Thanks for making the change.

I couldn't care less if the bar moves in either direction, but I guess no one will pick on my miserably low number anymore grin2.gif

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 21 2015, 19:52
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 02:39 )
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 21 2015, 10:30 )
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 21 2015, 19:21 )
blink.gif

¥i§_¨C¤Ñ¥Îcron job­pºâ¤@¦¸µM«áÀx¦b¤@Äæ¸Ì¡H

¤¸ª½, is it time consuming to run what ¦Ô¤à¤ó proposed - daily update?

I would assume that with even daily posts/votes, the activity level wouldn't change so much to the point that requires recalculations every time a post is loaded.

Cron job should be feasible, I'm testing the code now.

Edit: Just tested the code, takes less than 10 seconds to count last-7-and-30-day post numbers for each of the ~4300 members. This should work. I'm going to add reputation vote counter as well.

wacko.gif Hold on...10 seconds for each of the 4300 members? Even with only 9 seconds you're looking at 38,700 secs for the calculation, which translates to 645 mins or 10 hrs 45 mins, no?

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 21 2015, 20:39
¬¡ÅD«×¡G 120
µoªí¼Æ¡G 728
©ÒÄݸs²Õ¡G ¤@¯ë
µù¥U¤é´Á¡G 9-22-2003

Án±æ¡G158

I just noticed the change...Shouldn't ¬¡ÅD«× be capped at 100?

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 21 2015, 20:43
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 21 2015, 12:52 )
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 02:39 )
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 21 2015, 10:30 )
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 21 2015, 19:21 )
blink.gif

¥i§_¨C¤Ñ¥Îcron job­pºâ¤@¦¸µM«áÀx¦b¤@Äæ¸Ì¡H

¤¸ª½, is it time consuming to run what ¦Ô¤à¤ó proposed - daily update?

I would assume that with even daily posts/votes, the activity level wouldn't change so much to the point that requires recalculations every time a post is loaded.

Cron job should be feasible, I'm testing the code now.

Edit: Just tested the code, takes less than 10 seconds to count last-7-and-30-day post numbers for each of the ~4300 members. This should work. I'm going to add reputation vote counter as well.

wacko.gif Hold on...10 seconds for each of the 4300 members? Even with only 9 seconds you're looking at 38,700 secs for the calculation, which translates to 645 mins or 10 hrs 45 mins, no?

No, I mean less than 10 seconds total to "count last-7-and-30-day post numbers for each of the ~4300 members".

Now I have optimized the code, it will only scan members who has ever made a post or made a vote, and was active within the last 30 days. This shortened the loop to process only ~50 members, and takes less than 3 seconds to complete.

Now I have the data, I'm working on the formula, you may see the number change rapidly as I adjust the calculation.

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 21 2015, 20:56
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 21 2015, 13:39 )
¬¡ÅD«×¡G 120
µoªí¼Æ¡G 728
©ÒÄݸs²Õ¡G ¤@¯ë
µù¥U¤é´Á¡G 9-22-2003

Án±æ¡G158

I just noticed the change...Shouldn't ¬¡ÅD«× be capped at 100?

I will cap it at 100 eventually, but now I want to see the actual number to adjust the formula.

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 21 2015, 23:45
½Õ¾ã¥X¤@­Ó¤è®×¡A¤j®aµ¹ÂI·N¨£¡H

¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ¤èªk¦p¤U¡G

¡]A¡^¦³µn¤JªºÁ`¤é¼Æ / µù¥U¦Ü¤µÁ`¤é¼Æ
¡]B¡^³Ìªñ³X°Ý¬O¦b¦h¤Ö¤Ñ¤§«e ¡]¦p¶W¹L30«h·í§@30¡^
¡]C¡^³Ìªñ7¤Ñµo©«¼Æ + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµo©«¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ7¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/9 ¡]C¶µ«D§Y®É§ó·s¡A¼È©w¨C¤p®É¦Û°Ê§ó·s¤@¦¸¡^

¬¡ÅD«×= A*30 +¡]30 - B¡^+ C*1.5

¶W¹L100¥uÅã¥Ü100¡C

µoªíªÌ: ¦Ô¤à¤ó Aug 22 2015, 01:41
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 07:45 )
½Õ¾ã¥X¤@­Ó¤è®×¡A¤j®aµ¹ÂI·N¨£¡H

¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ¤èªk¦p¤U¡G

¡]A¡^¦³µn¤JªºÁ`¤é¼Æ / µù¥U¦Ü¤µÁ`¤é¼Æ
¡]B¡^³Ìªñ³X°Ý¬O¦b¦h¤Ö¤Ñ¤§«e ¡]¦p¶W¹L30«h·í§@30¡^
¡]C¡^³Ìªñ7¤Ñµo©«¼Æ + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµo©«¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ7¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/9 ¡]C¶µ«D§Y®É§ó·s¡A¼È©w¨C¤p®É¦Û°Ê§ó·s¤@¦¸¡^

¬¡ÅD«×= A*30 +¡]30 - B¡^+ C*1.5

¶W¹L100¥uÅã¥Ü100¡C

¬Ý¤W¥hÁÙ¦X²z

­è·s¶iªº·|­û¥u¶·7¤Ñ¤]µn¤J¦Ó¥Bµo20©«(©Î60­Óµû»ù)´N100¬¡ÅD«×¤F¡A¤£¹L¥H¤µ¤ÑHKSANªº±¡ªp¨ä¹êÁÙ¥i¥H


µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 22 2015, 02:03
¶¶±a¤@´£¡A¤µ¤ÑÁÙ¶¶¤â·d¤F¨Ç¨ä¥Lªº§ó·s¡C

http://hksan.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=15634&view=findpost&p=223950

µoªíªÌ: Pearltea Aug 22 2015, 05:55
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 07:45 )
½Õ¾ã¥X¤@­Ó¤è®×¡A¤j®aµ¹ÂI·N¨£¡H

¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ¤èªk¦p¤U¡G

¡]A¡^¦³µn¤JªºÁ`¤é¼Æ / µù¥U¦Ü¤µÁ`¤é¼Æ
¡]B¡^³Ìªñ³X°Ý¬O¦b¦h¤Ö¤Ñ¤§«e ¡]¦p¶W¹L30«h·í§@30¡^
¡]C¡^³Ìªñ7¤Ñµo©«¼Æ + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµo©«¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ7¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/9 ¡]C¶µ«D§Y®É§ó·s¡A¼È©w¨C¤p®É¦Û°Ê§ó·s¤@¦¸¡^

¬¡ÅD«×= A*30 +¡]30 - B¡^+ C*1.5

¶W¹L100¥uÅã¥Ü100¡C

I like it. It weighs evenly with the 3 main activity attributes and applies a heavier weight or 'bonus' (1.5) to participations. Then the count of comments is a more decisive factor than the count of votes, so it seems pretty reasonable to me.

µoªíªÌ: Caesar Aug 22 2015, 08:01
Sooooooooo
Whats the tick next to 100?

µoªíªÌ: Caesar Aug 22 2015, 08:15
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 07:45 )
½Õ¾ã¥X¤@­Ó¤è®×¡A¤j®aµ¹ÂI·N¨£¡H

¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ¤èªk¦p¤U¡G

¡]A¡^¦³µn¤JªºÁ`¤é¼Æ / µù¥U¦Ü¤µÁ`¤é¼Æ
¡]B¡^³Ìªñ³X°Ý¬O¦b¦h¤Ö¤Ñ¤§«e ¡]¦p¶W¹L30«h·í§@30¡^
¡]C¡^³Ìªñ7¤Ñµo©«¼Æ + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµo©«¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ7¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/9 ¡]C¶µ«D§Y®É§ó·s¡A¼È©w¨C¤p®É¦Û°Ê§ó·s¤@¦¸¡^

¬¡ÅD«×= A*30 +¡]30 - B¡^+ C*1.5

¶W¹L100¥uÅã¥Ü100¡C

¬Ý¨£§Ú¨º­Ó93¡A³o¹ê¦b¤Ó¶Ë¤ß¤F

§Ú¦b³Ìªñ¤C¤Ñ¤Î¤T¤Q¤Ñµoªí¼Æ¡B­«³X¦¸¼Æ¤]¬O¦W¦C«e­Tªº¡C
¬JµM§Ú¯à¤W¨Ó¬Ý¤F¡AB³¡¤]¸Ó¬Oº¡¤Àªº¡C

¥i§Úªº±b¸¹¬O¤Q¦~«eµù¥Uªº¡A¦Ó¥B¦³¸g¾ú¨â¤T¦¸¬°®É¤@¦~¥H¤Wªº²`¼ç¡C
³o³¡¤À°l¤£¦^¨Ó§r¡C(°£«D­«²{©õ¤é¤j¤pº¡Ä骺¯«¸Ü)

¥i§_¨p¤ß´£Ä³¡A¦bC³¡¥[¤@¶µ¡AÁ`µoªí¼Æ/1000 ³o¼Ë twisted.gif (§A³ßÅw /500 or /250 ¤]¥i¥H )

§Y¨Ï©âÂ÷¦Û¨­§Q¯qÃö«Y¡A§Ú»{¬°³o¤]¬O¦X²zªº¡C
­þ¤Ñ­n¬O³DÅ]¥~¹C®ø¥¢¤@­Ó¤ë¡A¥Lªº¬¡ÅD«×¥u³Ñ¤G¤Q¦h¡C
¥i­n»¡«¥®aHKSAN¡A¦³½Ö¤ñ¥L§ó¬¡ÅDªº¡H

¦³­ÓÁ`µoªí¼Æ·í¸É©³¡A¬¡ÅD«×¤U­°¤]ºC¤@ÂI¡A¦b­pºâ¤W¤]¤£¤Óºc¦¨­t¾á¡A
¦Ó¥B¬°½×¾Â°^Äm1000¶K¤~¸É©³¤@ÂI¡A¤]¤£¬°¹L§r¡H

µoªíªÌ: ¦Ô¤à¤ó Aug 22 2015, 11:33
¦W¦C«e­T§Y¬O¦h¤Ö°Ú¡H(­nª¾¹D¤µ¤Ñ¬¡ÅD©óHKSANªº¤Ö©ó¤Q­Ó) twisted.gif

¦pªG¥~¹C¨S¤Wªº¸Ü¡A¨ä¹ê¦b¨t²Î¬Ý¨Ó´N¯u¬O¤£¬¡ÅD¤F¡A·íµM­n­°§C¤@¤U¡C¦pªG¤Ó¬½ªº¸Ü¡A¤£¦p§â¤@¬P´Á¤ºªº©«§ï¦¨¨â¬P´Á¤ºªº©«¡A¤@­Ó¤ëªº©«§ï¦¨¨â­Ó¤ëªº©«¡H

µoªíªÌ: Caesar Aug 22 2015, 13:20
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 22 2015, 19:33 )
¦W¦C«e­T§Y¬O¦h¤Ö°Ú¡H(­nª¾¹D¤µ¤Ñ¬¡ÅD©óHKSANªº¤Ö©ó¤Q­Ó) twisted.gif

¦pªG¥~¹C¨S¤Wªº¸Ü¡A¨ä¹ê¦b¨t²Î¬Ý¨Ó´N¯u¬O¤£¬¡ÅD¤F¡A·íµM­n­°§C¤@¤U¡C¦pªG¤Ó¬½ªº¸Ü¡A¤£¦p§â¤@¬P´Á¤ºªº©«§ï¦¨¨â¬P´Á¤ºªº©«¡A¤@­Ó¤ëªº©«§ï¦¨¨â­Ó¤ëªº©«¡H

©Ò¥H§A§Ñ¤F¥Ü·N¡A§A¹ï³o´£Ä³ªººA«×¬Opositive ÁÙ¬Onegative§r

µoªíªÌ: ¦Ô¤à¤ó Aug 22 2015, 15:26
QUOTE (Caesar @ Aug 22 2015, 21:20 )
QUOTE (¦Ô¤à¤ó @ Aug 22 2015, 19:33 )
¦W¦C«e­T§Y¬O¦h¤Ö°Ú¡H(­nª¾¹D¤µ¤Ñ¬¡ÅD©óHKSANªº¤Ö©ó¤Q­Ó) twisted.gif

¦pªG¥~¹C¨S¤Wªº¸Ü¡A¨ä¹ê¦b¨t²Î¬Ý¨Ó´N¯u¬O¤£¬¡ÅD¤F¡A·íµM­n­°§C¤@¤U¡C¦pªG¤Ó¬½ªº¸Ü¡A¤£¦p§â¤@¬P´Á¤ºªº©«§ï¦¨¨â¬P´Á¤ºªº©«¡A¤@­Ó¤ëªº©«§ï¦¨¨â­Ó¤ëªº©«¡H

©Ò¥H§A§Ñ¤F¥Ü·N¡A§A¹ï³o´£Ä³ªººA«×¬Opositive ÁÙ¬Onegative§r

¨ä¹ê§Ú¨S©Ò¿×ªº laugh.gif

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 22 2015, 18:36
QUOTE (Caesar @ Aug 22 2015, 01:15 )
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 07:45 )
½Õ¾ã¥X¤@­Ó¤è®×¡A¤j®aµ¹ÂI·N¨£¡H

¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ¤èªk¦p¤U¡G

¡]A¡^¦³µn¤JªºÁ`¤é¼Æ / µù¥U¦Ü¤µÁ`¤é¼Æ
¡]B¡^³Ìªñ³X°Ý¬O¦b¦h¤Ö¤Ñ¤§«e ¡]¦p¶W¹L30«h·í§@30¡^
¡]C¡^³Ìªñ7¤Ñµo©«¼Æ + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµo©«¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ7¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/9 ¡]C¶µ«D§Y®É§ó·s¡A¼È©w¨C¤p®É¦Û°Ê§ó·s¤@¦¸¡^

¬¡ÅD«×= A*30 +¡]30 - B¡^+ C*1.5

¶W¹L100¥uÅã¥Ü100¡C

¬Ý¨£§Ú¨º­Ó93¡A³o¹ê¦b¤Ó¶Ë¤ß¤F

§Ú¦b³Ìªñ¤C¤Ñ¤Î¤T¤Q¤Ñµoªí¼Æ¡B­«³X¦¸¼Æ¤]¬O¦W¦C«e­Tªº¡C
¬JµM§Ú¯à¤W¨Ó¬Ý¤F¡AB³¡¤]¸Ó¬Oº¡¤Àªº¡C

¥i§Úªº±b¸¹¬O¤Q¦~«eµù¥Uªº¡A¦Ó¥B¦³¸g¾ú¨â¤T¦¸¬°®É¤@¦~¥H¤Wªº²`¼ç¡C
³o³¡¤À°l¤£¦^¨Ó§r¡C(°£«D­«²{©õ¤é¤j¤pº¡Ä骺¯«¸Ü)

¥i§_¨p¤ß´£Ä³¡A¦bC³¡¥[¤@¶µ¡AÁ`µoªí¼Æ/1000 ³o¼Ë twisted.gif (§A³ßÅw /500 or /250 ¤]¥i¥H )

§Y¨Ï©âÂ÷¦Û¨­§Q¯qÃö«Y¡A§Ú»{¬°³o¤]¬O¦X²zªº¡C
­þ¤Ñ­n¬O³DÅ]¥~¹C®ø¥¢¤@­Ó¤ë¡A¥Lªº¬¡ÅD«×¥u³Ñ¤G¤Q¦h¡C
¥i­n»¡«¥®aHKSAN¡A¦³½Ö¤ñ¥L§ó¬¡ÅDªº¡H

¦³­ÓÁ`µoªí¼Æ·í¸É©³¡A¬¡ÅD«×¤U­°¤]ºC¤@ÂI¡A¦b­pºâ¤W¤]¤£¤Óºc¦¨­t¾á¡A
¦Ó¥B¬°½×¾Â°^Äm1000¶K¤~¸É©³¤@ÂI¡A¤]¤£¬°¹L§r¡H

§Aı±o93§C¶Ü¡]¦Ó¥B²{¦b§Aµo¤F3-4©«´NÅÜ100¤F¡^¡H§Úı±o9x¬O¤@­Ó¤ñ¸û°ªªº¼Æ¦r°Ú¡C²{¦b¦¹¥DÃDùؤj³¡¤À¤H³£¤w¸g¬O100¤F¡A§Ú¬Æ¦Üı±o¦p¦¹¼Ð·Ç¦³ÂI¼eÃP¡C·íµM¤]¬O¦]¬°²{¦bµo©«ªÌ¥»¨Ó´N¤Ö¡A¬G·N¼eÃP¨Ç¡C

³zÅS¤@¤U¡A§AªºC¶µ¤À¼Æ¦b§Aµo³o©«¤§«e¡AÀ³¸Ó¬O±Æ¦W²Ä5-6¥ª¥k¡C grin2.gif

A+B+C¬O¤£Ãø¶W¹L¤@¦Êªº¡A°²³]¬Y¤H¦b¹L¥h¤@¬P´Á¦³30­Ó¯d¨¥¡]¥­§¡¤@¤é4-5­Ó¯d¨¥¡Aºâ¤£¤W¤jº¡³e§a¡^¡A´N¤w¸g¦³60¤À¤F¡A¦A¥[¤W³Ìªñ³X°Ý¦b¤µ¤Ñªº30¤À¥´©³¡A´N¤w¸g¦³90¤F¡A¨Ã¤£»Ý­nA³¡¤À¦³¦h°ª¤À¼Æ¡C¦Ó¦pªG¦³Pearltea³o¼Ëªº¬¡ÅD¡A³æ¬OC¶µ*1.5¨t¼Æ«á´N°ª¹F90¤F¡A§Y¨ÏA¶µµL­­±µªñ0¤À¡AC+B¤]¤w¸g120¤F¡C

¤£¹L§ÚÃÙ¦P§A«ü¥Xªº¡A¶W¹L7¤Ñ©M30¤Ñ¨S¨Ó³o­Ó¤À¼Æ´N·|«æ¼@¤U­°ªº°ÝÃD¡A´«¥y¸Ü»¡¤U­°¦±½u¤£°÷¥­·Æ¡A¤½¦¡¯Ç¤JÁ`µoªí¼Æ½T¹ê¥i¥H¦Ò¼{¡C§Ú¦A½Õ¾ã¤@¤U¬Ý¬Ý¡C

µoªíªÌ: Caesar Aug 22 2015, 18:55
®@¨º¥y93¬OÀ¸¨¥¡A§Ú¨S¦³¥´¤W :evil grin: Ū¤£¥X»y®ð


µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 22 2015, 22:59
²{¦bªº¤è®×¦p¦ó¡H

¬¡ÅD«×­pºâ¤èªk¦p¤U¡G

¡]A¡^Á`µn¤J¤é¼Æ / Á`µù¥U¤é¼Æ
¡]B¡^³Ìªñ³X°Ý¬O¦b¦h¤Ö¤Ñ¤§«e ¡]¦p¶W¹L30«h·í§@30¡^
¡]C¡^³Ìªñ7¤Ñµo©«¼Æ + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµo©«¼Æ/3 + ³Ìªñ90¤Ñµo©«¼Æ/6 + ³Ìªñ7¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/2 + ³Ìªñ30¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/6 + ³Ìªñ90¤Ñµû»ù¥L¤H¦¸¼Æ/12 ¡]C¶µ«D§Y®É§ó·s¡A¶È¨C¤p®É¦Û°Ê§ó·s¤@¦¸¡^
¡]D¡^Á`µo©«¼Æ / Á`µù¥U¤é¼Æ

¬¡ÅD«×= A*20 +¡]30 - B¡^+ C + D*10

¶W¹L100¥uÅã¥Ü100¡C

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 22 2015, 23:01
µ¹§A­Ì¬Ý¤@¤U¨C¤p®É²Î­pªº¿é¥Xµe­± tongue.gif

µoªíªÌ: Caesar Aug 23 2015, 04:47
¤Ó°¶¤j¤F¡A¬Ý¨£¤@°ï¦Ñ·|­ûªº¦W¦r¡C
ªk§µª½³o¦W¦r¤£¬O§Ú°O¿ù¤F§a¡H

¨º­Ó§Æ¯S°Ç¤]¸Ó¤£·|¬O¬Y¦¸·M¤H¸`¬¡°Ê¤¤¶ê±I¤j®v©Ò©ñªº¤Û³N§a¡H

µoªíªÌ: ¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 Aug 23 2015, 07:15
QUOTE (neveryield @ Aug 20 2015, 04:01 )
QUOTE (¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 @ Aug 20 2015, 05:42 )
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 19 2015, 17:40 )
QUOTE
¤´µM¬O­Ó«Ü¤£³ôªº¼Æ¦r( = =")

LOL. Thanks for calling me out for being inactive.

If I have to guess how the active level is calculated, it should be by the following formula:

# of days logged into HKSAN / (Today - Date Registered).

So based on my registration date you know that out of those 4,000+ days, there were many, many days I didn't log in.

Let me try to solve your problem. Your active level is 90% and your registration was on Oct 8, 2014, so it's been 315 days since your account is activated. 90% reflects approximately 284 days of recorded login. Therefore, if you have no login records in the next 3 days, your active level will drop to 89.3% (284/(315+3)). However, in the next following 7 days, if you login again every single day, you'll be back to 90% (round up (291/325 or 89.5%)

ÁÂÁ¡C±ß¤W6ÂI¥ª¥k¨£¨ì§A¡A¦­¤W5ÂI¥b¤S¨£¨ì§A¡A§A¦³¨¬°÷ªººÎ¯v¶Ü¡H¬O­Ó¹q¸£¤£Â÷¨­ªº¤H¡H¦pªG§Ú¨Sºâ¿ùªº¸Ü¡A´Nºâ¥¼¨Ó10¦~§A­·«B¤£§ï¦a¨C¤Ñµn¤J¡A§Aªº¬¡ÅD«×¥u·|¦^¤É¨ì55-56 ( = =") ÀHµÛµn¤Jªº¤Ñ¼Æ¼W¥[¡AÁ`µù¥U¤Ñ¼Æ¤]¦b¼W¥[... ¨º­Ó¬¡ÅD«×¦pªG­n°lªº¸Ü¡A­n¥Î¥b¥Íªº®É¶¡...

©Ò¥H§A»¡»¡¬Ý Ãi³D¤j¤j¨s³º¬O¦³¦hÃi¡C

»{¦P, ¬O­Ó¤£©ö©ñ±óªº¤H°Ú

p.s. ¥»¨Ó§Ú¥u¬OÀH«K»¡»¡... ¦U¦ìªº»{¯u¶W¶V¤F§Úªº´Á±æ, ¦Ú, ÁÂ¥D¶©®¦.

µoªíªÌ: Ãi³D Aug 23 2015, 14:39
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 19:01 )
µ¹§A­Ì¬Ý¤@¤U¨C¤p®É²Î­pªº¿é¥Xµe­±  :P

­þ¸Ì¬Ý¡H

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 23 2015, 15:20
QUOTE (Ãi³D @ Aug 23 2015, 07:39 )
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 19:01)
µ¹§A­Ì¬Ý¤@¤U¨C¤p®É²Î­pªº¿é¥Xµe­±  :P

­þ¸Ì¬Ý¡H

«á¥xµ{§Ç¼È¥¼¥´ºâ¶}©ñ¡A¥H«á¦³®É¶¡¤]³\§â³¡¤À²Î­p¾ã¦X¤J½×¾Âªº²Î­p­¶­±¡C

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 25 2015, 08:43
QUOTE (Ãi³D @ Aug 23 2015, 07:39 )
QUOTE (®}¤¸ª½ @ Aug 22 2015, 19:01)
µ¹§A­Ì¬Ý¤@¤U¨C¤p®É²Î­pªº¿é¥Xµe­±  :P

­þ¸Ì¬Ý¡H

²{¦b¥i¥H¬Ý¤F¡A¨£http://hksan.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=15634&view=findpost&p=224239¡C

µoªíªÌ: ®}¤¸ª½ Aug 25 2015, 09:03
QUOTE (¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 @ Aug 23 2015, 00:15)
QUOTE (neveryield @ Aug 20 2015, 04:01)
QUOTE (¸ÕÅç±b¸¹2 @ Aug 20 2015, 05:42)
QUOTE (Pearltea @ Aug 19 2015, 17:40)
QUOTE
¤´µM¬O­Ó«Ü¤£³ôªº¼Æ¦r( = =")

LOL. Thanks for calling me out for being inactive.

If I have to guess how the active level is calculated, it should be by the following formula:

# of days logged into HKSAN / (Today - Date Registered).

So based on my registration date you know that out of those 4,000+ days, there were many, many days I didn't log in.

Let me try to solve your problem.  Your active level is 90% and your registration was on Oct 8, 2014, so it's been 315 days since your account is activated. 90% reflects approximately 284 days of recorded login.  Therefore, if you have no login records in the next 3 days, your active level will drop to 89.3% (284/(315+3)). However, in the next following 7 days, if you login again every single day, you'll be back to 90% (round up (291/325 or 89.5%)

ÁÂÁ¡C±ß¤W6ÂI¥ª¥k¨£¨ì§A¡A¦­¤W5ÂI¥b¤S¨£¨ì§A¡A§A¦³¨¬°÷ªººÎ¯v¶Ü¡H¬O­Ó¹q¸£¤£Â÷¨­ªº¤H¡H¦pªG§Ú¨Sºâ¿ùªº¸Ü¡A´Nºâ¥¼¨Ó10¦~§A­·«B¤£§ï¦a¨C¤Ñµn¤J¡A§Aªº¬¡ÅD«×¥u·|¦^¤É¨ì55-56 ( = =") ÀHµÛµn¤Jªº¤Ñ¼Æ¼W¥[¡AÁ`µù¥U¤Ñ¼Æ¤]¦b¼W¥[... ¨º­Ó¬¡ÅD«×¦pªG­n°lªº¸Ü¡A­n¥Î¥b¥Íªº®É¶¡...

©Ò¥H§A»¡»¡¬Ý Ãi³D¤j¤j¨s³º¬O¦³¦hÃi¡C

»{¦P, ¬O­Ó¤£©ö©ñ±óªº¤H°Ú

p.s. ¥»¨Ó§Ú¥u¬OÀH«K»¡»¡... ¦U¦ìªº»{¯u¶W¶V¤F§Úªº´Á±æ, ¦Ú, ÁÂ¥D¶©®¦.

爲¤F§A¤@¥y¦R¼Ñ§Ú´N«ã¼g¤T¦Ê¦h¦æ¥N½X¡A§Ú¤]¤£ª¾¹D¹Ï¤°»ò°Ú¡C sideways.png 

¨ä¹êÀ³¸Ó¬O³oùؤS¦³¨Ç¤H¨Ó¤F¡A©Ò¥H¤S¦³°Ê¤O¥hµy爲°µÂI¨Æ¤F¡C

Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)