
香港三國志 · 版規 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
歡迎訪客 ( 登入 | 註冊 ) | 重寄認證電子郵件 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
徐元直 |
發表於: Dec 9 2008, 04:26
|
![]() 攤抖首領 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 發表數: 7,913 所屬群組: 君主 註冊日期: 9-18-2003 活躍:58 聲望:4176 ![]() |
註:內有殺降場面
-------------------- ......
|
one way ticket |
發表於: Dec 10 2008, 01:43
|
||
![]() 五品官 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 發表數: 775 所屬群組: 一般 註冊日期: 10-19-2003 活躍:7 聲望:165 ![]() |
那不是"降",片段cut走了水上飄浮日兵拿出手榴彈欲與美軍同歸於盡部分,嚴格來說美軍沒有"殺降" -------------------- |
||
徐元直 |
發表於: Dec 10 2008, 02:08
|
![]() 攤抖首領 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 發表數: 7,913 所屬群組: 君主 註冊日期: 9-18-2003 活躍:58 聲望:4176 ![]() |
那只是其中一個吧(離戰艦很近那個)。還有另外的畫面是落水人員周圍爆出一串水花,不見得是自殺,美軍往海裡開槍也不見得是子彈太多要浪費一下。
-------------------- ......
|
綠茶館小女 | |
![]() Madora :3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 發表數: 1,213 所屬群組: 太守 註冊日期: 1-04-2006 活躍:10 聲望:644 ![]() |
It is understandable why American soldiers would shoot at surrendered soldiers on the sea including their comrades.(Seen in 2:14 I suppose?) When facing an enemy renowned for suicidal attacks, capturing/rescuing soldiers floating on the sea was a very dangerous act. Soldiers on-board were unable to judge if a floating soldier was friend or foe as he was too far from the ship / vessels. The best measure to minimize casualty was to shoot at anyone floating on the sea to prevent being hit by kamikaze attack.
This practice was usually performed by soldiers with high pressure under Japanese Kamikaze attacks in the Pacific Theatre or on killing spree. 本篇文章已被 綠茶館小女 於 Dec 10 2008, 02:35 編輯過 |
死魚 |
發表於: Dec 10 2008, 04:58
|
||
![]() 七品官 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 發表數: 389 所屬群組: 一般 註冊日期: 8-29-2008 活躍:6 聲望:54 ![]() |
Japanese soldiers got shot because the American soldiers will never want to risk themselves and get a sucidal attack. Like what the one in front of me said, the way that you capture is bring him up on the ship, but you never know is he having any weapon on his body until the last second! So I guess it is not just the American soldiers kill the people that is surrendered (of course that they might kill them for fun= =) but they just simplily doesn't want to get hurt. easier to understand >.> [COLOR=red]MECRY KILL |
||
綠茶館小女 |
發表於: Dec 12 2008, 07:20
|
![]() Madora :3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 發表數: 1,213 所屬群組: 太守 註冊日期: 1-04-2006 活躍:10 聲望:644 ![]() |
They would rescue soldiers after battle to prevent casualty during rescue. During the heat of battle, soldiers would be unable to distinguish soldiers far away within a long distance. To protect themselves, shoot first, ask later. It was not mercy killing in the video if Americans were shot in the video. It was more likely to be friendly fire.
本篇文章已被 綠茶館小女 於 Dec 12 2008, 07:24 編輯過 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |