有關阿波羅號登錄月球之真偽 和 諾厄方舟的科學存在性

小弟正在做一個有關超自然現象或未能確定真偽的事件的論文
暫時鎖定為以上兩樣題目
當然就是要以科學理據去證明或反駁以上的事件

之前我有看過一篇文章談及阿波羅號登錄月球的真偽
內裡有科學館助理館長的回覆，所以有點興趣
在此想問問大家有沒有看過一些相關的官方文件紀錄、正反雙方的論點等等呢？

另外我曾聽過有關諾厄方舟的發現，好像是在俄羅斯附近的一個山頂上發現一古船？
另又曾聽聞有一些科學家考察出古時真的曾有可能出現一大洪水時期
對此我沒有甚麼資料，不知大家有沒有聽過這些事？

最好當然是英文喇^^
謝謝大家的幫忙！^^

我記得我以前post過登月的
http://hksan.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=456

不過是中文...

本篇文章已被 Leaf 於 Apr 22 2004, 07:14 編輯過

呵呵~是讀Critical thinking嗎？還是其他？

如果題目是說一定要證明或否證，那選題就要小心了。例如諾厄方舟這種糢糊不清的命題，似乎不太容易去否證，當然也難以證明。如果只是需要列舉證據去支持或反駁一種特定的假說，這樣就會比較容易，例如探討諾厄方舟裝載所有陸地動物的實際可能性，又或者分析人類登月乃是造假這些陰謀論的可信性，這就不難。

我曾經做過人體自燃，臨死經歷，見鬼，還有"落茶擔馬屎"之預言等題目，說不上論文，只是短文，但都是要先列出一些清晰具體的立場再加以分析(尤其是語義上的分析)。不過不同課程對寫作要求可能也有很多不同之處，這我就說不準了。

沒多久之前Pearl才播過諾厄方舟的真假, 王兄也post過有關文章, 那個post應還在這裡...
那個節目不知可不可以找回...

昨晚又有講摩西過紅海

本篇文章已被 鮑鮑 於 Apr 22 2004, 09:17 編輯過

唔，我那個是English 1A來的
相信元直你應該有經驗吧…嘿
我這個班的主題都是探討一些超自然現象或一些科學未能完全解釋，又或是未能確定的東東

這個嘛，我主要是想研究
1. 分析美國的阿波羅號登月乃是的真確性
2. 分析諾亞方舟在歷史中是否真的存在與及是否真的曾有如聖經上的用途(載上所有生物的一對在舟上)

剛在網上看看，原來曾經有有可能是方舟的古木代石放在梵蒂岡博物館中展覽的
不知大家有沒有聽過？

其實我也想知道那些節目名的…
可以用來引證一下嘛^^

基本上我是打算抽以上其中一個題目來做的
因為我對其他東東都沒有甚麼認知
(這裡就是其中的一些題目)

沒記錯元直你已經完成了Eng 1A吧？
不如將你的paper資料都給我好了~嘿嘿

那個節目我有錄,要不要參考一下?!
那節目中文名是:"挪亞方舟神話不再"....你不急的話我有空再給你.....

critical thinking應該是english 1C吧，你們的1A真是奇怪，可能prof的口味比較特別。我讀過的1A只是讀些詩，抒些情，還有討論社會種族文化道德之類的東西，完全沒有你列出來的這些題目，反而Psy3就通通都是這類題目。我的1A final paper是講死刑的，對你來說應該沒用。

這麼說來，如果是1A的話，我猜大概不必像Psy3/1C那般太著重於邏輯推理了，反而行文的清晰和流暢程度會很重要。

登月陰謀方面：
http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi...ence/apollo.txt

http://www.apollo-hoax.me.uk/index.html

諾亞方舟：
http://www.google.com/custom?q=noah&cof=GI...ch=infidels.org

http://www.google.com/custom?q=noah&sa=Sea...talkorigins.org

要注意上面那些url大部分都是傾向於否定的。

hi~!
元直兄是否就是說志狼兄所做的節目有點像 critical thinking 的類型, 但他所讀的科目其實總的來說反而是行文的清晰和流暢程度會很重要。

可能是每間college/每個instrutor 也不同吧
我的老師是基於以下幾點來評分的：
(括號內是我第一份paper的分數，而我的第一份論文在此，獻醜了=.=")
1. Thesis Strength (3)
2. Organization (3)
3. Paragraph Logic (1)
4. Sentence combining (2)
5. Mechanical Errors (1)
6. Parenthetical Citation (4)
7. Works Cited Page (4)
8. Source Evaluation (3)
9. Assignment requirements (5)

以1為最差，5為最好，整份論文最後分數是C- =.="

老師的主評是：
you have some good film critique here, but your mechanics slow you down. I'm often confused by awkward sentences and paragraphs.

其實我也花了不少時間在這篇文章上的，但我摸不透為甚麼他會說我的logic、mechanics有嚴重問題…當然我會遲些找他問清楚的，但現在或者元直你們先看一下給點意見吧，我想下一份論文做好一點呢…u.u

你所說的1C，在我這邊應該是ENG B2吧…
我可不想去惹那個部份，看到西人的詩我會頭暈的=.=
所以應該會報Phil B9 吧…T_T

今天和同學們討論那些題目，他們都認為我既然是天主教徒，總會對諾亞方舟的存在性有偏袒的論調，而且能找到的scholarly sources不多，所以大多建議我做阿波羅=.=

唔，待會看完你的連結後再回回~


南海你懂得把影像傳入電腦中？是的話那就太好了！^^
下個星期將會是research week…所以如果可以的話…嘿
不過先料理好你的A-LEVEL吧 =口=

本篇文章已被 •天地志狼• 於 Apr 23 2004, 06:26 編輯過

Vampires我看了一下，感覺內容還是挺充足的，但根據老師的評語，似乎問題正在於前面所說的"行文清晰和流暢程度"方面。下面我就冒昧作一些簡評吧：

作為說明文式的文章，每一段(至少是大部分段落)都應該有與段落主旨相關的開頭與結尾。我覺得Vampires在這一點上做得不太好，尤其是開頭部份經常欠缺，往往直接就進入細節了，這樣子段落與段落之間缺乏連貫性，加上每段的內容比重往往大小不一，整篇文章的架構也變得不好理解(即使有outline對照)。Paragraph Logic的問題可能便在這裡。

至於Sentence combining和Mechanical Errors方面，也就是通順的問題，就只能靠長時間的寫作鍛鍊了。你可以多做些peer editing，讓一兩個讀者圈出文中所有他們覺得看不懂意思或看得比較吃力地方，嘗試在這些地方修改自己的表述方式直到讀者清楚明白為止，這樣應該會比較快有改善。

另外，開頭和結尾的表達方式都不錯，但中間則略嫌單調，都是重複地舉例>>說明>>舉例>>說明，你可以嘗試用其他的手法加插其中(例如比喻)。

本篇文章已被 徐元直 於 Apr 23 2004, 09:17 編輯過

PP你仲要唔要資料? 我學校個gallery有相關既官方文件
得閑可以幫你睇睇

唔，其實開頭兩段是想給一些從未接觸過vampires的人有一基礎概念，之後再討論他們的變化與歷程。但有不少peer review的結果都是覺得頭兩段太長，找不到主旨(Thesis)所在，所以有點混亂。這一點我想真的要留意一下了…嗚

你的意思是不是說每一段段頭都應該有一子主題(段落Thesis)讓人清晰知道這一段會講甚麼？唔，的確我好像沒有做到這點呢…有虐段落其實是transition來的，不過到頭來好像更混亂了讀者=.=

你說的寫作手法，我不知道應該怎樣在阿波羅登月一文中表摹出來。因為如果平鋪直敘地道出那20個疑點再加回解釋反駁，的確太單調了…但除此之外又可以怎樣表達呢？把反駁的論點融入日常生活中寫出來？唔唔…

有當然好喔！不過最好是告訴我那些官方文件名稱/書名，好讓我看看這邊的圖書館有沒有…因為我要影印我qoute的句子才能有分，老師說這是為了減少在網上下載論文直接用的機會=.=" 謝謝喇^^

放係個博物館唔係書籍黎架...
係一d登月既證書, 相(真的),
幾位太空人簽名送俾個director既紀念品等等........

狼兄,不是我會傳到電腦中,而是用電腦tv card來錄的....
星期三考完給你吧....要是我見到你的話......

談阿波羅登月確實比較難在日常生活中找到例子。不過你也可以想辦法把論點與論點之間用敘事性的語言串連起來，例如偶然插一些設問之類的，總之盡量讓文章有因果或者時間上連貫性，而不是完全分散開來的點列式。除了不單調外，這樣還可以增加可讀性。就好像學英文字母，學唱字母歌總比逐個字母依順序去背要容易吧？這正是前者有連貫性的好處。

寫這類文章，一些報紙雜誌上的專題報導是很好的學習對象。雖然這些文章很多時候都是從多方面去分析一個題目，裡面需要提及很多不同的論點和事件，但整篇文章讀起來總是會有一種很連貫的，看故事般的感覺，這是其寫作技巧上的高明之處。

對，就是這個意思。姑且用一篇以前寫的功課作為例子吧，談不上是甚麼好文章，不過在段落安排方面還是花了些功夫的：

Crossing the Colorline

The United States is a mixing pot of different colors and cultures, but they are not entirely mixed together. People form different ethnic groups in this nation; there are dominant groups and minor groups. We distinguish such differences as races. It is widely agreed today that biologically, race does not exist. There is neither a superior race nor an inferior race. However, the classification of race has made its imprints in our past, and it still will in our future. Hopefully, this time it would be in a more constructive way.

Race is an important factor that shaped our history. Back to the age of World War II, race was such a serious topic that it could make the difference between life and death. The Nazis and Japanese both used racial superiority as the main reason to wage war. The history and culture of America itself was constructed heavily on racial issues as well. Bonnie Kae Grover, in her article “Growing Up White In America?” mentioned that, “Maybe I’m uncomfortable extolling white culture especially if it replaces other folks’ culture . . . It seems to me that too much of white culture is built on stamping out culture that isn’t white . . .”(377) The idea of race itself is not evil, it is evil that someone used this idea to persecute others. That’s why in the article “Double Consciousness”, W.E.B. DuBois writes: “The problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the colorline.”(383) In fact, the problem of racial conflict is not an invention of the twentieth century. It can be traced back for thousands of years, everywhere around the globe. The idea of race seems so rooted into our civilization, and it digs so many wounds on our history, yet we still cannot wipe it out completely.

However, the meaning of race is not entirely negative. Every race has its own cultural heritage, its way of thinking and its way of living. Just like every one of us is unique, every race has something special. When we are talking about race don’t just think for the color of the skin, or the height, or the look. For example, it could be difficult to distinguish a Chinese from a Japanese just by looking at their face, but could we say that they are the same? Sure not. In ”What Means Switch” written by Gish Jen, there is clearly a cultural gap between the Japanese boy Sherman and the author whose parents were came from China. In the article, she stated that, “All over the world, people have their own cultures. That’s what we learned in social studies.”(346) She felt the gap between herself and Sherman. There are conflicts because of these differences, but the diversity of race also makes the diversity of the world.

Today, the barrier between races is fading away. Our world is growing more civilized and rational. We have less and less stereotypic identification of races or colors. There are more and more occasions of people from different races living together. More and more people like James McBride, the author of “What Color Is Jesus”, have parents coming from different　races. McBride was puzzled by his self-identity, whether he is black or white. He asked his parents but their answers are neither black nor white, “Forget about black. You are a human being.”(391) Sometimes the definition of color no longer applies. This further challenges the meaning of race. How can we make a strict definition of race? Who can assure that he or she is pureblooded? Apparently that is becoming more difficult.

The only thing unchanged is change itself. Looking back a hundred years, there is a dramatic difference. But our ideas and concepts may not be fast enough to follow this rapid change. There is a joke people make that shows us the difference between expectation and fact.
　You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a　
　white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, one of the tallest guys
　in the NBA is Chinese, the Swiss hold the America's Cup,
　France is accusing the U.S. of arrogance, Germany doesn't
　want to go to war . . .
The world is not going crazy, but it takes time and effort for people to realize what is going on. Geographical barriers created race, and today’s highly developed communication and transportation network are breaking down these barriers. It is an irreversible trend that we are sticking back together after we have separated for hundreds of thousands of years since our ancestors walked out of Africa. However, this doesn’t mean we are all going to be the same in the future. The barriers may fade away, the discriminations may fade away, the conflicts may fade away, but it will never be the case that the diversity of races will fade away. The Nazis used to determine if one was Aryan or Jewish by measuring one’s face; the Ku Klux Klan distinguished allies from enemies by the brightness of their skin. But the true definition of race is not going to be simply black or white, red or yellow, blue eyes or golden hair. The idea that lies behind it, supporting it, is the culture, the tradition. They are the foundations of our civilizations and will not vanish just because we are living together again. Through humanity's efforts, the prejudices towards races are disappearing, but the idea of race is still vivid and meaningful, in a positive manner.

可以看到差不多每一段的頭尾都有紅色的段落thesis和conclusion，而藍色則是全文的總結。

本篇文章已被 徐元直 於 Apr 24 2004, 08:26 編輯過